AI·AX transformation
We find repetitive work, connect data and tools, and decide where people review. We build AI workflows that are actually used on the ground.
You adopted AI — but has the way you work changed?
Teams we work with
- Teams spending too much time organizing material and reporting
- Organizations whose information is scattered across many tools
- Companies that need to set AI priorities and scope
The change customers get
Less repetitive work.
We cut time spent collecting, sorting and drafting so people can focus on what needs their judgement.
Better-quality decisions.
Sources, review points and exception rules are recorded so the automation isn't merely fast.
The team actually uses it.
We start within your current tools and permissions and organize the usage guide and operating responsibilities.
Metrics we check together
- Work lead time
- Revision & rework rate
- Team usage rate
- Review pass rate
Work diagnosis
From interviews and real workflows, we map repetitive steps, data sources and decision points.
Pilot design & build
We pick one high-priority task and connect it from input through AI processing to review and execution.
Team adoption & operation
We define usage guides, exception handling, access permissions and owners' roles, and improve with real usage feedback.
Services & pricing guide
AX diagnostic sprint
When you need to decide what to change first · 2–3 weeks · Quoted after consultation
- Work interviews & flow analysis
- Opportunity & risk priorities
- Step-by-step action roadmap
AI workflow pilot
When you validate one core task for real · 4–8 weeks · Quoted after consultation
- Workflow & prompt design
- Prototype & tool integration
- User validation & operating guide
AX operating system
When you extend to more work and teams · 8–12+ weeks · Quoted after consultation
- Multi-task & permission system
- Data & tool integration
- Operations dashboard & team training
4C strategy
CUSTOMER VALUE
Does it give people's time back to important decisions?
COST
Does it reduce repetitive time, errors and rework costs?
CONVENIENCE
Can it be used inside the current workflow rather than as a new tool?
COMMUNICATION
Are AI's sources and the human review status visible?
From message to results
Empathy with the problem
Describe repetition and bottlenecks in the customer's real work language.
Usage scene
We show the scene of input, result and review before listing features.
Pilot proposal
We clarify the task to validate on a small scale, the data needed and the scope of responsibility.
Organization-wide adoption
We measure usage and review quality and extend to the next automation.
Deliverables
- Workflow & opportunity report
- Roadmap by priority
- AI workflows and pilots
- Usage, review & operation guide
Where AI belongs, we find inside your work.
This example illustrates a workflow design. It is not real customer data or real output, and it does not connect to external tools or send data.
Content production
Hunting for material again for every channel and repeating the brand explanation each time.
A draft is written using the brand standards and product information together, then checked by the owner.
- Gathering context: Brand guide · product information · channel specs
- Drafting: Message extraction · copy for each channel
- Owner review: Fact check · brand expression · usage rights
- Delivering the approved version: Final copy · production material per channel
External posting and ad spend go ahead only after the owner's separate approval.
Consultation & proposal prep
Preparing by switching between consultation notes, past proposals and service material.
Requests are organized within permitted material, and people judge scope and conditions.
- Organizing requests: Consultation notes · services offered · approved cases
- Proposal prep: Organizing questions · linking related material
- Scope assessment: Feasibility · quote · contract terms
- Next conversation: Confirmed meeting material · follow-up tasks
Final quotes, contract commitments and messages to customers are never executed automatically.
Team operations & reporting
Collecting everyone's updates and chasing what is missing.
We put work records into one format and separate exceptions and items that need a decision.
- Collecting records: Work updates · schedule · issue log
- Summarizing differences: Deduplicate · summarize · flag gaps
- Exception review: Checking against the source · priorities · owners
- Sharing execution: Reviewed report · next tasks · owners
Performance evaluation and HR decisions are not part of the automation scope.
The final scope and deliverables are agreed in the proposal and contract after the diagnosis.
Project inquiry